Re: Migration of non-free packages to testing
>>"John" == John Goerzen <email@example.com> writes:
John> On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 03:25:46PM -0800, Stephen Zander wrote:
>> That certainly wasn't the case the last time I asked about packgaes in
>> non-free. <URL:http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2002/debian-legal-200210/msg00230.html>
>> Personally, I wish someone would (re-)propose a GR so this pointless
>> bickering can go away once & for all.
John> Well, that someone was me last time. What do people think about it now?
That GR is not dead, it is merely on hold, and I have every
intention of resurrecting it when the voting GR finally goes through.
Indeed, the only thing I am waiting on is
a) For raul to get back with an amended GR about voting on -vote
b) Someone else look at aj's and raul's discussion and comeup with a
GR that passes aj's and raul's muster
c) I recode parts of the voting engine as required by the new voting
The two GR's that have been pending shall then be brought back
to life, once we can vote on it.
"No program is perfect," They said with a shrug. "The customer's
happy-- What's one little bug?" But he was determined, Then change
two, then three more, The others went home. As year followed
year. He dug out the flow chart And strangers would comment,
Deserted, alone. "Is that guy still here?" Night passed into
morning. He died at the console The room was cluttered Of hunger and
thirst With core dumps, source listings. Next day he was buried "I'm
close," he muttered. Face down, nine edge first. Chain smoking,
cold coffee, And his wife through her tears Logic, deduction.
Accepted his fate. "I've got it!" he cried, Said "He's not really
gone, "Just change one instruction." He's just working late." The
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C