Re: Migration of non-free packages to testing
Josip Rodin <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> There may also be people who would do the task. If they made patches to
> support non-free in buildds in a reasonable manner, these patches should be
> considered regardless of the fact they're there to support non-free.
I would say that this is up to the developer of buildd.
> Or some other arrangement should be made so that non-free packages aren't
> discriminated against WRT the release process.
They *are* discriminated against, and always will be. Geez, it's not
like they have *rights*.