On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 12:50:26AM +0200, Joakim Kolsjö scribbled: [snip] > > which files would contain the customized settings for what we have now and > > the Desktop Debian variant. It would probably require extending the > > alternatives system to the configuration files, though (or perhaps making > > the config files auto-generated in postinst and removed/backed up/migrated > > in prerm etc.?) > > > > Okey... this seems nice. There is one thing that i have been thinking about. > Are two diffrent menus good, one for KDE and one for Gnome. Or is it better > to create one "Debian Desktop" menu that has the same contents in both KDE > and GNOME? Nah. Don't repeat the RedHat mental fart they did in their last release. GNOME and KDE are two different environments and they should be kept separated in a visible way, IMHO. I expect Debian Desktop to deliver the same set of modifications to both environments, but I see no point in making a mess out of the newbie KDE user's desktop or the newbie GNOME user's desktop. I think it's healthier to keep those two separate. > Office - > - KOffice > - Kword > - Gnome Office > - Abiword > - Gnumeric > - Openoffice > - Writer > ... > > The problem is to keep it small... Much ado about nothing, IMHO :) marek
Attachment:
pgpz0D5M_XSiK.pgp
Description: PGP signature