Re: Spam: process the web archives?
* Keith G. Murphy <firstname.lastname@example.org> [021016 16:03]:
> To all the people that replied: sorry, I didn't think before I posted.
> Or not well; my thought process was: "We can't do that; folks don't want
> HTML E-mail; wait, this is web-based: images are OK!". Should have gone
> one more step.
> Guess you could use ALT tags, but the harvesters would presumably get
> those too.
The same is with images. gocr and co are quite good. And some
free-SMS-services had already to discover that making people to
type in a number from image does not make automation very
It is an public discussion. And e-mail addresses are neccessary to
contact the people involved.
Bernhard R. Link
<gEistiO> sagen wir mal...ich hab alle sourcen in /lost+found/waimea
<me> gEistiO: [...] Warum lost+found?
<gEistiO> wo haette ich es denn sonst hingeben solln?