[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Spam: process the web archives?

* Keith G. Murphy <keithmur@mindspring.com> [021016 16:03]:
> To all the people that replied: sorry, I didn't think before I posted. 
> Or not well; my thought process was: "We can't do that; folks don't want 
> HTML E-mail; wait, this is web-based: images are OK!".  Should have gone 
> one more step.
> Guess you could use ALT tags, but the harvesters would presumably get 
> those too.

The same is with images. gocr and co are quite good. And some
free-SMS-services had already to discover that making people to
type in a number from image does not make automation very

It is an public discussion. And e-mail addresses are neccessary to
contact the people involved.

  Bernhard R. Link

<gEistiO> sagen wir mal...ich hab alle sourcen in /lost+found/waimea
<me> gEistiO: [...] Warum lost+found?
<gEistiO> wo haette ich es denn sonst hingeben solln?

Reply to: