Re: Warning to Debian Developers regarding BitKeeper
>>"Colin" == Colin Watson <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
Colin> Please, revision control system advocacy is not relevant here!
Colin> BitKeeper is relevant because the Linux kernel is managed
Colin> using it, and you'll have to do a lot more than make
Colin> suggestions - and do it elsewhere, too - to change
Colin> that. There's no point debating it here.
I am not advocating any revision control system here -- but we
can't really advocate BitKeeper, since we do not have the license to
distribute it, or even use it as a project, since we do have official
products that contain competitive software, no?
"I prefer the blunted cudgels of the followers of the Serpent God."
Sean Doran the Younger
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C