[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]


> It seems to have worked reasonably well so far to only enable LFS where
> obviously needed (fileutils, backup software), and when someone files a
> bug asking for it (slrn for example), and when upstream enables it (perl
> I think). At least I cannot remember seeing any requests for LFS turned
> on in a given program being ignored, and I'm confident that anything
> reasonable I throw at a large file will probably support it and is at
> the most a bug report away from doing so.


Reply to: