On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 12:46, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Simon Richter wrote: > > That .la files are close to useless on GNU systems does not make them > > less valuable for portable programs, and unless you want each developer > > to patch them out in his .diff.gz (because a good upstream wouldn't > > accept a patch that breaks his program on many platforms), your best > > option is to leave them in and make sure they don't stand in the way > > (which is possible). > > Wrong. You refresh libtool on the debian-packaged version of the software, > and don't bother upstream. Debian libtool should be patched to kill the .la > files. > Of course it shouldn't be! The Debian libtool is used by any upstream developer who develops on Debian. Scott -- Scott James Remnant Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange http://netsplit.com/ things happen? Are you going round the twist?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part