[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Accepted po-debconf 0.2.2 (all source)

Tomohiro KUBOTA <tkubota@riken.go.jp> immo vero scripsit:

> This does not immediately mean that I insist that UTF-8 should be used
> for storing Debconf translations.  I just said usage of UTF-8 does not
> bring any problems.

It does cause a problem.

Description-XX: fields used to be whatever encoding they were,
and with sarge, some of them appear in UTF-8.
That is my main concern, and why I think Encoding-XX: field
isn't the best way to go.


dancer@debian.org : Junichi Uekawa   http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423  7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/

Reply to: