Re: Improper NMU (Re: NMU for libquota-perl)
Le Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 12:42:20PM -0400, Elie Rosenblum écrivait:
> I also don't see a bug submitted with this. If you're submitting
> NMU's, you sure as hell better be submitting bugs with patches (or
> the fact that no patch is required other than rebuilding with an
> updated system).
The NMUer has to send the patch of the NMU to the maintainer, either
through the BTS or directly, yes.
> Please delete your uploads. You are violating policy.
Policy doesn't rule the NMUs. There's no rule for NMUs, just
guidelines ... and the guideline during a BSP are "NMU without prior
notification but upload to DELAYED in order to leave some time to the
maintainer if he's not happy with the NMU".
> For debian-devel: The NMU here was made to rebuild for perl 5.8;
> no other changes would have been necessary.
You should stop complaining about the NMU, the perl 5.8 upgrade has
been announced twice on debian-deval-announce.
If you were a good maintainer, you would already have uploaded a fixed
package compiled against perl 5.8 and you wouldn't have had a single
So please ... don't complain about NMUers when they are only trying ot
help you !
Raphaël Hertzog -+- http://www.ouaza.com
Formation Linux et logiciel libre : http://www.logidee.com