Re: base-files and /dev
On Wed, 24 Jul 2002 12:23, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > > I guess your script is already doing exceptions for /usr and /var and
> > > so on (or are those owned by the last package installed). So you should
> > > just add another exception and not register /etc with the base-files
> > > domain.
> > No, they are not exceptions, they are regular directories. Unlike
> > /dev which on a devfs system is a mount point for a different file
> > system which is quite different from others. For example try
> > creating a regular file under /dev on a devfs system.
> Actually, I tried that a long time ago, indirectly: /dev/pts was added
> to base-files in 2.1.18, and removed in 2.1.20 because of problems
> with devfs :-) No other incompatibility problems have been reported
> between base-files and devfs since then. I think the problem here is
> that you consider the /dev directory itself as a file when it's not.
I don't consider /dev to be a file. It's just that on a devfs system with
the default configuration the /dev directory on the root file system will at
all times be obscured by the devfs file system that is mounted on top of it.
Therefore it's best that you not try to do things with /dev unless you check
for the presense of a mounted devfs first.
I do not get viruses because I do not use MS software.
If you use Outlook then please do not put my email address in your
address-book so that WHEN you get a virus it won't use my address in the
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org