Re: gnupg-doc of standard priority?
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 06:20:42AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> I don't like that one being standard either. IMHO, it's far easier to
> read on the web, and more up to date.
By approximately two weeks and about a dozen document updates at an
average point in unstable. Granted, stable is more out of date (far too
much right now); I proposed updating the version in stable a few months
ago, but the release manager wasn't interested.
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: