Re: gnupg-doc of standard priority?
On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 08:26:13PM -0500, Scott Dier wrote:
> > > using priorities to set up a useful system.
> > Some peoples ideas of a 'useful system' don't include large amounts of
> > extra documentation thats not needed for the functionality.
>
> In which case they can uninstall the package. What's the fuss?
The same argument ("they can uninstall the package") could be applied
to TeX or emacs, but we agreed to make them optional because there was
a consensus to keep the default system small. Adding a package with 2MB
of installed-size to the set of standard packages is a step in the
wrong direction.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: