On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 08:37:56AM +0200, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
> > > This will, to my understanding violate the clause 6 of the GPL2. You must
> > > not restrict distribution more than the GPL. This means with an unmodified
> > > GPL you cant add aditional requirements.
> >
> > Uh, he's the Copyright holder. He can do whatever the hell he wants.
>
> IANAL, but I don't feel good about licenses saying 'GPL but...' -
> probably much better to have the whole license text, without stating
> that it is 'GPL', but stating that it is GPL based somewhere outside the
> license text.
Except that the GPL itself says:
Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies
of this license document, but changing it is not allowed.
Oops.
--
Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@bluecherry.net> Crazy in the coconut
<james> abuse me. I'm so lame I sent a bug report to
debian-devel-changes
Attachment:
pgpMAm9UaoHoy.pgp
Description: PGP signature