Re: Linux Fonts

To: Dustin Mofos <lung82@yahoo.com>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Linux Fonts
From: Bernd Eckenfels <lists@lina.inka.de>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 06:47:00 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20020709044700.GB24573@lina.inka.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20020709021553.10139.qmail@web11106.mail.yahoo.com>
References: <[🔎] 20020708191349.GA1382@atterer.net> <[🔎] 20020709021553.10139.qmail@web11106.mail.yahoo.com>

On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 07:15:53PM -0700, Dustin Mofos wrote:
> So, what if I released it under GPL with a stipulation
> that any modification requires a name change?

This will, to my understanding violate the clause 6 of the GPL2. You must
not restrict distribution more than the GPL. This means with an unmodified
GPL you cant add aditional requirements.

Greetings
Bernd

-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Linux Fonts
  - From: Oliver Elphick <olly@lfix.co.uk>
- Re: Linux Fonts
  - From: Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@bluecherry.net>

References:
- Re: Linux Fonts
  - From: Richard Atterer <deb-devel@list02.atterer.net>
- Re: Linux Fonts
  - From: Dustin Mofos <lung82@yahoo.com>

Prev by Date: Re: you have to tag sid bugs (was: Release-critical Bugreport for July 5, 2002)
Next by Date: Re: Linux Fonts
Previous by thread: Re: Linux Fonts
Next by thread: Re: Linux Fonts
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread