On Tue, 2002-07-09 at 07:58, Joseph Carter wrote: > On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 06:47:00AM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > > > So, what if I released it under GPL with a stipulation > > > that any modification requires a name change? > > > > This will, to my understanding violate the clause 6 of the GPL2. You must > > not restrict distribution more than the GPL. This means with an unmodified > > GPL you cant add aditional requirements. > > Uh, he's the Copyright holder. He can do whatever the hell he wants. IANAL, but I don't feel good about licenses saying 'GPL but...' - probably much better to have the whole license text, without stating that it is 'GPL', but stating that it is GPL based somewhere outside the license text. cheers -- vbi -- secure email with gpg http://fortytwo.ch/gpg
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part