Re: The best recommendation for allowing "su" in X
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 09:18:13PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Osamu Aoki <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > What recommendation should I give to the reader for "su" in X?
> > Here is the back ground. FAQ is:
> > "I want to run X from a user account. It is a good thing. But how can
> > I get a program which requires root privilege to run from this X
> > session?"
> > "export XAUTHORITY=$HOME/.Xauthority"
> This probably won't work if /home is on an NFS-mount, iirc sux works
> around this.
This is interesting. Thread under:
discusses issues for these quite.
"sux" is an interesting short shell script but it is not packaged as a
debian package. I will mention this but I wanted to recommend one
option to the user as "good enough" fix. I will mention this if it is
Creating symlink is a good aproach but only useful for one user account.
Maybe, I should have asked out of 5 approaches (or similar ones usung
XAUTHORITY), which one is the best for the common user? This is for
running GUI program like "printtool". Non-GUI can use simple su, sodo,
or super, as I know.
For clarity 5 choices for putting "export XAUTHORITY=$HOME/.Xauthority"
1) ~/.profile or .bash_profile: (not for gnome-session)
2) ~/.xinitrc : only works for startx. (I use this)
3) ~/.bashrc : ugly. (.bashrc is not for ENVIRONMENT VARIABLES)
4) ~/.xsession : kills Debian's nice configuration scheme. (Way to complicated)
5) /etc/X11/Xsession.d/10xfree86-common_su: Too complicated. For all.
Which is best?
~\^o^/~~~ ~\^.^/~~~ ~\^*^/~~~ ~\^_^/~~~ ~\^+^/~~~ ~\^:^/~~~ ~\^v^/~~~ +++++
Osamu Aoki @ Cupertino CA USA
See "Debian reference": http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-reference/
"Debian reference" Project at: http://qref.sf.net
I welcome your constructive criticisms and corrections.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org