Re: should automake1.6 "provide" automake?
Eric Dorland <email@example.com> immo vero scripsit:
> > I have an impression that automake1.6 is really non-compatible with automake1.5
> > AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE format has changed between 1.5 and 1.6
> If you mean the fact that AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE takes a new parameter, i
> believe it's optional, so it does not break anything.
It's behaving backward compatibly, but automake1.6 seems to not
require parameters that automake 1.5 required, for AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE.
firstname.lastname@example.org : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org