Re: Clarification of WineX packaging request
On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 02:27:13AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > The winex sources doesn't include those bits.
>
> Yes, but the nasty folks said that they have to be nasty about WineX
> in order to protect copy-protection and other such things for third
> parties.
"Never attribute to malice that which can adequately be explained by
stupidity" or some variation thereon. Can't remember who said it, though.
I'd be happier if you referred to them as "misguided" or "unenlightened"
rather than "nasty"...
Cheers,
Nick
--
Nick Phillips -- nwp@lemon-computing.com
Don't read everything you believe.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: