On Sun, May 26, 2002 at 08:33:10PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Sun, 26 May 2002, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > On Sun, May 26, 2002 at 02:29:15AM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> > > On 26 May 2002, Brian May wrote:
> > > > - 0 bugs in BTS.
> > > All 25000+ bugs closed? Yeah, right, that'll happen.
> > That's an underestimate. We have roughly 100 new bugs opened a day,
> > so if we were to release in six months, say, we'd have to close 18,000
> > additional bugs or so, or 43,000. Which is to say we'd have to close
> > bugs at about 240% of the rate we currently do, without increasing the
> > rate at which we file bugs.
> You might want to recalculate things.
True. Apparently it's more like 150 new bugs per day:
BPD=150;
for a in `seq 148200 -1000 120000`; do
k=/org/bugs.debian.org/spool/db-h/00/$a.status;
if [ ! -e "$k" ]; then
k=/org/bugs.debian.org/spool/archive/00/$a.status;
fi;
x=`head -2 < $k | tail -1`;
l=$(((148200 - $a) / $BPD));
echo "$a $l:" `date -d "1/1/1970 $x seconds"` `date -d "$l days ago"`;
done
gives an estimate that matches the data fairly closely.
> I have my index generator turned off, and I run it manually every so often.
> It gives me how many new bugs, and how many archived bugs, it has scanned
> since the last run.
> Archived: 2768
> Changed: 1302
> New: 2156
> So, we have more bugs being archived(an indication of bugs being closed) than
> we do have new bugs being filed. And, it's by a wide margin.
That seems pretty odd. The non-wishlist, non-merged graph shows the number
of bugs is rising, so if that difference (600 fewer open bugs at one time
than another) it's an artifact of fixed bugs being closed, wishlist bugs
being closed, or bugs with many many merged reports being closed.
Is there any way of validating your numbers?
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``BAM! Science triumphs again!''
-- http://www.angryflower.com/vegeta.gif
Attachment:
pgpcBo120rQix.pgp
Description: PGP signature