Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd
Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> writes:
> Are you trying to be difficult? Why is it so hard for you to grasp the
> idea that someone might want to know the kind of rationale that would
> justify a new top level directory? (The fact that debian would want to
> see such a directory standardized in fhs is neither disputed nor the
> subject of inquiry.)
I think the rationale that justify /hurd, in the minds of the Hurd
developers, as part of the design of that system, have been explained
over and over and over again. I think there is no value to trying to
find general criteria; indeed, it seems to me that it's a mistake to
think that there needs to be a "justification" for some isolated
aspect of systems design.
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: