Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd
Emile van Bergen <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> You're reasoning based on authority *again*. Why? Nobody is telling
> anybody to do anything.
I think it's the right design decision for the Hurd. So, in fact, do
all the other Hurd developers that have said anything on the subject.
> However, the FHS itself does not currently define such criteria AFAIK,
> and I assume the people in charge of it are wise enough to consider any
> *good* suggestion for "good general criteria", whether originated by
> Thomas Bushnell, BSG, or J. Random Hacker, yours truly, or a collection
> of people who happened to be on debian-hurd and debian-devel at a
> particular moment in time.
I think the FHS would be making a serious mistake if it decided to
establish "good general criteria". I can see no useful value that
such criteria would serve.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org