Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd
On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 01:20:35PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> And:
>
> none of this is appropriate for debian-devel.
> none of this is appropriate for debian-devel.
> none of this is appropriate for debian-devel.
> none of this is appropriate for debian-devel.
> none of this is appropriate for debian-devel.
> none of this is appropriate for debian-devel.
> none of this is appropriate for debian-devel.
Well, instead of jumping at us for pursuing our curiosity (which I think
you'll agree is warranted), how about suggesting an appropriate list?
It's not entirely clear what that is, if not d-d or d-h. (A peek at
http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/devel.html *might* suggest bug-hurd,
but I'm not sure. It's an oddly named list for general discussion, but
also the only public list on the page.)
--
Glenn Maynard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: