Re: HURD/Linux/BSD* ... Loosing focus.
Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> writes:
> Instead of the hand-wringing, could you provide some concrete examples
> of cases where the Debian organization has forced hurd to abandon a
> technical enhancement, so we could discuss some factual material?
Why? This hasn't happened, Jeff didn't say it happened, and
NONE OF IT IS RELEVANT ON THIS MAILING LIST.
NONE OF IT IS RELEVANT ON THIS MAILING LIST.
NONE OF IT IS RELEVANT ON THIS MAILING LIST.
NONE OF IT IS RELEVANT ON THIS MAILING LIST.
NONE OF IT IS RELEVANT ON THIS MAILING LIST.
NONE OF IT IS RELEVANT ON THIS MAILING LIST.
NONE OF IT IS RELEVANT ON THIS MAILING LIST.
NONE OF IT IS RELEVANT ON THIS MAILING LIST.
NONE OF IT IS RELEVANT ON THIS MAILING LIST.
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: