Re: possible mass-filing of bugs: many shared library packages contain binaries in usr/bin
This one time, at band camp, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
>On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 10:27:32PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
>> There are some shared library packages that contain binaries in usr/bin
>> It is generally a bad idea, considering co-installation of
>> shared libraries with different sonames.
><list of packages>
>The problem is that we don't have /libexec in Debian GNU/Linux (we do
>in GNU/Hurd). I really think that's a bug and those binaries in these
>library packages probably belong in /libexec.
How is The Hurd at all relevant to placement of *-config scripts?
Well done, Captain Irrelevant.
To the sane members of this list: I suggest using the alternatives system
Well vers'd was he in ye skylles of LARTe;
'twas said thirteen dozenne spammers he'd cleaved apart!
His bootes were black, and about his wayste
A cellephone, and a Leathermanne fair well were playc'd.
-- Tanuki the Raccoon-dog emulating Chaucer,
in the Scary Devil Monastery
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org