Brian May <email@example.com> immo vero scripsit:
> If libeditline conflicts, provides libreadline, and has
> /usr/lib/libreadline.so*, then it would be 100% ABI compatible, and
> programs would be able to use either. (you could argue that it isn't
> currently 100% ABI compatible due to the different name).
The last time I looked at libeditline, it did not look very good,
and the packaging of it was not very good either.
It is possible to divert the shared library, but I
recommend against it. I have been through this already with
"Compatible ABI" usually isn't.
Since it is a license violation in the upstream level,
I recommend asking the upstream to fix their bugs.
firstname.lastname@example.org : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org