[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: libreadline

Brian May <bam@snoopy.apana.org.au> writes:

> > Horrible idea.  I want to have libreadline on my system *and*
> > libeditline, *and* use all the available applications.  The conflict
> > you suggest would destroy this.
> In that case, why not create another package?

Huh?  How would creating another package help?  Maybe I'm
misunderstanding something.

> > The thing to do is to actually fix the packages in question to link
> > against libeditline itself.
> (remembering that the goal of the Debian maintainer should not be to
> rewrite configure scripts which may never get integrated upstream).

The Debian maintainer cannot simultaneously meet *all* goals in cases
like this.  The question is, which is the best one to let slide.  It
seems to me that having the maintainer make a trivial one-line change
to the source is much better than any of the other alternatives.


To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to: