On Sat, 2002-05-04 at 16:58, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Brian May <email@example.com> writes:
> > This means packages can build depend on this new package, and will
> > automatically link to use libeditline instead of libreadline.
> Horrible idea. I want to have libreadline on my system *and*
> libeditline, *and* use all the available applications. The conflict
> you suggest would destroy this.
In that case, why not create another package?
> The thing to do is to actually fix the packages in question to link
> against libeditline itself.
(remembering that the goal of the Debian maintainer should not be to
rewrite configure scripts which may never get integrated upstream).
Brian May <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org