Re: [ Request for Help ] Re: BTS improvements (was: Re: 88 Priority violations in woody
>>"Adam" == Adam Heath <doogie@debian.org> writes:
Adam> On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> We really should have the RC list generated by bugscan, with a
>> overrides file (we already have this) controlled by the RM -- and
>> that list should then be the official list for RC bugs.
Adam> I rather dislike having all this bts-related meta-data not
Adam> stored along side the rest of the other bts meta-data.
Adam> I would love to have the debbugs code, and bts itself, be a
Adam> more open process. However, there isn't really that much that
Adam> goes on behind the scenses. What I am wanting, is people who
Adam> would like to start fixing the debbugs code, to make it more
Adam> readable, easier to work with, extend, and to add new features.
If I may borrow an expression from aj, yes, Dear, that's very
nice, and in the long run I am sure that is the way to go, an all
slicing, all dicing, ACID transaction capable DB with access controls
(only RM can set/reset RC flags, registered users only may close bugs
[no more spam closed bugs]).
In the mean while we have working code, that would help
everyone get a clearer picture of the RCness of the release
process. If you think the new debbugs would be in place for woody+1,
wonderful.
Adam> If you would like to help out, then please subscribe to
Adam> debian-debbugs@lists.debian.org, and we can start this going.
All right. I can at least try to help the process.
manoj
--
You should all JUMP UP AND DOWN for TWO HOURS while I decide on a NEW
CAREER!!
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: