Re: O: gnu-standards -- GNU coding standards
On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 20:53, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Why should the DFSG have to worry about such philosophical questions?
> Why isn't it enough to worry about the license?
Because software isn't documentation?
Think of it this way: national security would be so much easier to
maintain if we could just define cryptography as a weapon of war,
equivalent to a nuclear device, "for the purposes of the import
regulations". We all know how well that worked.
Similarly, it would be a lot easier to just define documentation to be
software "for the purposes of the DFSG". But does it make sense?
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org