Re: The GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) and /usr/share/common-licenses
>>"Dale" == Dale Scheetz <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
Dale> On Sat, 6 Apr 2002, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> >>"Dale" == Dale Scheetz <email@example.com> writes:
Dale> There are an ever growing number of packages that make use of
Dale> the GNU Free Documentation License. Isn't it about time to put
Dale> a copy of this license into the common reference area?
>> Depends. Would you say that at least 1% of Debian packages use
>> a license before it be deemed ``common''? How many packages use this
>> license, then?
Dale> I can't answer any of your questions ;-)
Well, since there are these other issues being raised
(specificcally, the concern that GFDL may not meet the DFSG [I happen
to disagree with that statement, for what that counts for]), we
should wait for the dust to settle down before moving things into an
area designated for common, free, licenses, don't you think?
"Well, if you can't believe what you read in a comic book, what *can*
you believe?!" Bullwinkle J. Moose
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org