[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: how-to push a package in testing ?



Anthony Towns,

It appears that you can help me with the following problem:

gphoto2 in testing need a libusb package more recent that the one
currently in testing. This situation is due to a missing shlibs info in
the libusb currently in testing. This is fixed in libusb in sid and
gphoto2 in sid is build against this updated libusb.

I was hoping that the situation will solved itself when updated packages
entered in woody but this is not happening.

I see two solutions :
. upgrade of libusb and packages depending on it
. removing gphoto2 from testing and fixing the problem which causes
libusb to not be updated (I don't undersatnd what is specific in alpha).

Could you do something here ?

Thanks,
Christophe

On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 09:45:25PM -0600, Adam Majer wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 10:14:30AM -0500, christophe barb? wrote:
> > I have a problem which is certainly going to solvs itself soon but
> > I want to be sure.
> > A few package version ago, libusb lacks of shlibs info. This is now
> > solved and I have rebuild gphoto2 against the new libusb but during this
> > time my gphoto2 package requiring a 0.1.5 (upstream version) entered in
> > woody when the associated libusb package not (because of another
> > problem).
> > 
> > 
> > gphoto2 doesn't work with the libusb currently in woody. In excuses I
> > see :
> >      * libusb (1:0.1.4-2 to 1:0.1.5-3)
> >           + Maintainer: Christopher L Cheney
> >           + 11 days old (needed 2 days)
> >           + Valid candidate
> > 
> > Is this package going to enter in woody ?
> > If no, is it possible to push it ?
> > Or should we remove gphoto2 from woody ?
> 
> http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_output.txt
> 
> this is your friend :) [above] 
> 
> trying: libusb
> skipped: libusb (118+16)
>     got: 16+0: a-16
>     * alpha: gphoto2, gphoto2-dev, gtkam, gtkam-gimp, libgpio-dev, libgpio0, pencam, xsane
> 
> so it doesn't enter because it would break all of these packages
> 
> My suggestion would be to file bugs against these packages so that they get 
> rebuilt with the new version of libusb.
> 
> I've learnt it the hard way that bad shlibs will screw testing bad.
> Fortunatelly it only did that for one package :)
> 
> - Adam
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 

-- 
Christophe Barbé <christophe.barbe@ufies.org>
GnuPG FingerPrint: E0F6 FADF 2A5C F072 6AF8  F67A 8F45 2F1E D72C B41E

Thousands of years ago, cats were worshipped as gods.
Cats have never forgotten this. --Anonymous

Attachment: pgpLyjyiyJlaF.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: