Re: lm_sensors and alsa for _not_ custom built kernel?
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 10:12:09PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >>"Matt" == Matt Zimmerman <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> >> I think it would be a good idea if kernel-package could do this
> >> automatically, or at least that it would be documented how to build
> >> modules form debian kernels. On the other hand, for example the sparc
> >> architecture does not even provide separate kernel-headers for the
> >> different kernel-images found in the debian archive.
> Matt> I agree, the debian/rules incantation is unnecessarily arcane.
> unnecessarily? You are not using the expected front end that
> does it for you. If you want to use make-kpkg with kernel headers, or
> have a brilliantly simpler incantation, patches are gladly accepted.
That is because the front end does not do it for me; it requires a kernel
source tree, while building most modules only requires headers. Since
building modules alone doesn't really require any of the functionality of
make-kpkg, maybe we shouldn't add more complexity there, and instead create
a simple, standalone tool which only builds modules and not kernels. Then,
users running stock Debian kernels could just execute that tool after
upgrading to rebuild all of their modules against the headers in the
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org