[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Debian doesn't have to be slower than time.



On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 06:05:36PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 04:55:04PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > Make that "have all locales correctly deal with UTF8". If the user wants to
> > > use his locale with an UTF8 charset, so be it. Otherwise, leave it alone.
> > 
> > I don't see why using UTF8 as default is bad. UTF8 is the way it's
> 
> Then enlighten yourself in the whole issue using Google before you speak
> about what you don't know.
> 
> Hint: UTF8 is not the problem. Unicode is. And the major problem is in the
> compatibility CJK set.
> 

this has already been discussed to _death_ here and everywhere.
As long as the Japanese users do not mix chinese and korean, UTF-8
is adequate for them (heck, windows 2000/XP works internally
in unicode, and just translates output to other legacy Japanese
encodings for communication with outer world).
In this sense, using UTF-8 is no worse than using current japanese
encodings.
However, just mentioning the word "unicode" to a Japanese user
carries a lot of negative emotional presumptions and will be met
with strong criticism.

> > doesn't restrict you in any way AFAICT. So I think using UTF8 as the
> > default does make sense.
> 
> Do your research, and learn. Regardless of what side of the issue with

I did, I learnt.

> Unicode and CJK one decides to be in, it is _clearly_ not a simple matter,
> and your careless comments show you have no idea of the issue at hand.

I agree. But having UTF-8 as default indeed DOES simplify things,
and indeed is not THAT bad even for Japanese users - of course,
it goes without saying that they can easily switch to other encodings
if they desire so (could be even default for Japanese locale, 
after all - and everyone is happy)

> 
> Ask our resident Japanese i18n especialists what they would think of a
> proposal of UTF8 being the default charset for every locale.  The answers
> should at the very least give you an idea of the amount of effort it would
> take to get such a useless proposal through.

useless?
UTF-8 is currently the only way I can efficiently communicate in.
And it is the only encoding in which there are czech/slovak characters
and EURO sign (iso-8859-17 anyone?).

-- 
 -----------------------------------------------------------
| Radovan Garabik http://melkor.dnp.fmph.uniba.sk/~garabik/ |
| __..--^^^--..__    garabik @ melkor.dnp.fmph.uniba.sk     |
 -----------------------------------------------------------
Antivirus alert: file .signature infected by signature virus.
Hi! I'm a signature virus! Copy me into your signature file to help me spread!



Reply to: