On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 11:54:11AM -0500, Michael Stone wrote: > On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 10:27:43PM +0100, Manfred Wassmann wrote: > > IMHO it doesn't make much sense to close the lists as long as they are > > available in full detail through the web interface. If you want to > > spam the list you can get as many valid sender addresses as you like. > > Spammers aren't likely to go to the trouble. I still don't see wht a whitelist is necessary if a positive check from spamassassin shunts incoming messages to a moderation queue. We can presumably tweak spamassassin to the point where false positives are rare enough to not burden the moderators too much. I trust that no one's still advocating automatic blackholing of any mail, even ones that bury the needle on spamassassin. -- G. Branden Robinson | Debian GNU/Linux | If ignorance is bliss, branden@debian.org | is omniscience hell? http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
pgpwL4pLDKWha.pgp
Description: PGP signature