[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: localeconf package



On Tue, 12 Feb 2002 16:50:53 -0500
Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org> wrote:

> > > in which package should I fill the bug? =) the directory exists (four
> > > directories, indeed... one for each try) but the file doesn't
> > 
> > The X configlet is in xserver-common, so that's where you would file.
> 
> Er, no, Jeff, a bug like the above is more likely a -frontends bug.  :)
> 
> My configlet never explicitly opens any sort of database.  I go only
> through the configlet API to do such things.
so here are my last experiences with this neat idea:

I liked very much the idea of gnome-sudo... I thought I would try it
and probably use it on my own programs... then I tried:

$ gnome-sudo -u root /usr/bin/gnome-apt

typed my password at the box that was displayed and then... nothing
happened... 

then I thought that could be the problem... su'ed to root on a
terminal and ran gnomecc from inside it, now the locale conflet
is started *but* on another gnomecc that it runs by itself

xserver-common's is failing this way:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/xserver-common-configlet-capplet", line 146, in ?
    pagename = configlet_instance.get_page_display_name(page)
AttributeError: Dexlet instance has no attribute 'get_page_display_name'

after opening its own gnomecc also... important to note, also,
that there's that fancy "Debian" "root", but there's also
one "*MISSINGNAME*" in which the X server's configuration
is shown (locale's is not... I instaled locale's after....)

[]s!

-- 
    Gustavo Noronha Silva - kov <http://www.metainfo.org/kov>
*---------* -+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+-+
|  .''`.  | Debian GNU/Linux: <http://www.debian.org>         |
| : :'  : + Debian BR.......: <http://debian-br.cipsga.org.br>+
| `. `'`  + Q: "Why did the chicken cross the road?"          +
|   `-    | A: "Upstream's decision." -- hmh                  |
*---------* -+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+-+



Reply to: