Re: [kde] setting an /opt precedent
Ian Eure wrote:
> You make an interesting point - the FHS very clearly states: "Distributions
> may install software in /opt..." It also calls the restrictions placed on
> distributions using /opt "minor."
The operative word is not the word everyone has been arguing over
("ad-on"), but the word "may". It's our choice, and we have historically
chosen not to use /opt, and we clearly still have a consensus not to use
It's a pity that Eray seems to be unable to recognize this consensus,
since ignoring consensus is a good way to get yourself ignored, in
> I suppose the closest thing Debian has to add-on software would be packages
> with priority optional or extra.
It would probaby be software in non-free.
see shy jo