Re: stat vs stat64 - ugly problem
Wichert Akkerman <email@example.com> writes:
> Previously David N. Welton wrote:
> > Right, so how do we fix this? It is our problem, in that we need
> > to make the software we distribute work together. But are you
> > also saying that upstream shouldn't be setting that bit in their
> > header file?
> As long as the API (and ABI) never exports things like struct stat
> and offset_t (ie things that are affected by enabling LFS) it should
> not matter if you link things that are compiled with LFS with things
> that are not.
It wouldn't cause problems if you did stat64(&foo) where foo is a
regular 'struct stat'?
David N. Welton
Free Software: http://people.debian.org/~davidw/
Apache Tcl: http://tcl.apache.org/