Re: Quake2/GPL: At least source should go into main
On Sat, 2001-12-22 at 18:44, Erich Schubert wrote:
> But you didn't understand completely what i was talking about;
> i was considering not packaging the quake2 engine as binary, but
> packaging the _source_ for developers to look at.
How much value is there really in packaging the source, when one can
just get the latest version from CVS? Especially given that it will
likely be changing quite quickly in the near future as the QuakeForge
people, etc. hack on it.
Reply to: