Re: Upgrading X shouldn't overwrite XF86Config, or should it?
Branden Robinson <email@example.com> writes:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 09:44:28AM +0100, Mikael Hedin wrote:
> > See bug on xserver-common (closed, but not fixed IMO)
> 1) xserver-common doesn't have anything to do with XF86Config*
Well, /usr/bin/dexconf is a part of xserver-common, but actually, the
problem was that xserver-xfree86.postinst called dexconf and clobbered
the files. Sorry for the mixup. Anywaym it's fixed in -11.
> 2) have you bothered to support your opinion with facts, such as an
> understanding of how 4.1.0-11 works?
This was for 4.1.0-10, as the bug report says.
Did you read the bug-report, including the version info?
> I didn't think so.
Mikael Hedin, MSc +46 (0)980 79176
Swedish Institute of Space Physics +46 (0)8 344979 (home)
Box 812, S-981 28 KIRUNA, Sweden +46 (0)70 5891533 (mobile)
[gpg key fingerprint = 387F A8DB DC2A 50E3 FE26 30C4 5793 29D3 C01B 2A22]