Re: What happened to libgtkhtml19 in unstable?
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 11:55:31AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 06:33:57AM -0600, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 10:57:28AM +0100, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> > > "GAL is not meant to be api stable. It role is to provide a place
> > > to share code and to develop new interfaces. When things
> > > stabilize they move down into gnome or gtk.".
> > Ahhhh. It might be worth generalising that solution to other packages. The
> > gal so-name nonsense is a pain in the neck for management of "testing"
> > too.
> Please see the list of forwarded bugs against debian-policy.
I assume you mean Bug#100346.
I meant for other packages that want to use libgal, not for other
libraries like libgal. There's no mention in that log of gal afaics,
which makes it look like dropping libgal.so (and just leaving the .a)
isn't particularly being considered.