On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 12:13:14PM +0100, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote: > On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 07:19:13PM +0000, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > People may not be aware: sending a "close" to control sends the > > submitter a short email saying "This bug has been closed; you should > > be hearing from the maintainer with an explanation shortly", whereas > > sending to nnnnn-done does the same *but* it appends a copy of the > > email sent to nnnnn-done. Much more user-friendly. > The close command may be modified to send a copy of the eventually added > comments to nnnnn@bugs.debian.org and/or > nnnnn-submitter@bugs.debian.org. > IMHO in this way it would be more useful and the same user-friendly. ... and identical to the nnnn-done@bugs.d.o alias. In this case, I don't think that having multiple ways to do the same thing is beneficial. Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
pgpTY338pi2Wo.pgp
Description: PGP signature