Re: packaging pine
On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 10:38:03AM -0700, John Galt wrote:
>> On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>> >The only way that this will go away is if pgp4pine, uw-imapd and
>> >uw-imapd-ssl remove their Suggests: pine.
>> Pgp4pine is in contrib for that very dependency.
>It isn't a dependency, it's only a Suggests. It's in contrib because it's
>useless without non-free software. Note that uw-imapd, which also suggests
>pine, is in main, because it is still useful.
Not Depends:, a dependency. Can you really not tell the difference
between small d dependency and large D Depends: ? First you call
something in contrib part of Debian, now you can't tell the difference
between the normal speech usage of dependency and the Debian-specific
usage of Depends: Just find a hole to crawl in and pull it in with you.
FINE, I take it back: UNfuck you!
Who is John Galt? email@example.com, that's who!