Re: packaging pine
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 12:48:57PM -0700, John Galt wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> >It isn't a dependency, it's only a Suggests. It's in contrib because it's
> >useless without non-free software. Note that uw-imapd, which also suggests
> >pine, is in main, because it is still useful.
> Not Depends:, a dependency. Can you really not tell the difference
> between small d dependency and large D Depends: ? First you call
> something in contrib part of Debian, now you can't tell the difference
> between the normal speech usage of dependency and the Debian-specific
> usage of Depends: Just find a hole to crawl in and pull it in with you.
You are a troll.
If you reread my messages, you'll find that at no point did I refer to
anything in contrib as part of Debian. You, on the other hand, have
demonstrated not only technical ineptitude and lack of understanding, but an
even more pronounced inability to behave decently in a public forum. I have
yet to see you contribute anything but flames to any discussion or project,
and your previous message was a perfect example. You chimed in just to
point out something obvious and irrelevant, and didn't even get it right.
Welcome to my killfile.