[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: apache non-free?

On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Adam McKenna wrote:

> What Redhat calls the package is irrelevant.  Redhat's non-compliance with
> the Apache license (if indeed they are not compliant) has nothing to do with
> Debian.  It also doesn't matter whether Apache cares that Debian is
> non-compliant.  Unless we have an official letter from Apache saying that we
> can call our package "Apache", then we are in violation and we should fix
> this.  It may not be the most important thing for us to do right now, but it
> should at least be on the list.

Even if we have a letter excluding us, it will fail the DFSG.

Reply to: