Re: apache non-free?
On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Adam McKenna wrote:
> What Redhat calls the package is irrelevant. Redhat's non-compliance with
> the Apache license (if indeed they are not compliant) has nothing to do with
> Debian. It also doesn't matter whether Apache cares that Debian is
> non-compliant. Unless we have an official letter from Apache saying that we
> can call our package "Apache", then we are in violation and we should fix
> this. It may not be the most important thing for us to do right now, but it
> should at least be on the list.
Even if we have a letter excluding us, it will fail the DFSG.