Re: DevFS and "c00lness" (Re: Grub)
On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 08:25:08PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> You're claiming this is optimal? 1221 is still far, far too many to sort
> through. They also all have obscure names. DevFS is infinitely clearer.
Clearer. But I can't really agree that /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part3
(your example) is better than /dev/hda3. For one thing, IDE doesn't even
have luns.
Hamish, just not c00l any more. I must be getting old.
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish@debian.org> <hamish@cloud.net.au>
Reply to: