On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 11:53:06PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > ... > Clearer. But I can't really agree that /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part3 > (your example) is better than /dev/hda3. For one thing, IDE doesn't even > have luns. It would be c00ler if devfs followed existing standards, like the device binding name specification part of IEEE 1275, instead of the usual NIH syndrome. http://playground.sun.com/1275/home.html#OFdevice