[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: DevFS and "c00lness"

On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 11:53:06PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> ...
> Clearer. But I can't really agree that /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part3
> (your example) is better than /dev/hda3. For one thing, IDE doesn't even 
> have luns.

It would be c00ler if devfs followed existing standards, like
the device binding name specification part of IEEE 1275, instead of the usual 
NIH syndrome.


Reply to: