Re: Virtual package httpd-with-cgi-suppport.
On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 06:40:49PM +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 12:26:32PM +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote:
> > Agreed. I'll use 'httpd-cgi'. Bugs will be filed later this day (or
> > tomorrow, in case I don't find enough time today).
>
> Someone proposed to me (via private mail) to use httpd-with-cgi, as it's
> more descriptive and length doesn't matter anyways as virtual packages
> don't show up in dpkg listings...
>
> Anyone against this?
Yes.
It is inconsistent with pgp-i, mutt-i, gs-pdfencrypt.
I think httpd-cgi is pretty clear...
Jules
Reply to: