Re: bad upgrade from talkd to ktalkd ... whose bug?
On Sun, 21 Oct 2001, Peter Mathiasson wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 05:35:22PM +0200, Hugo van der Merwe wrote:
> > <crazy>I guess maybe one would want some neater interface to all this
> > inetd.conf stuff? Some debconf thingy? A bit like the nice debconf
> > question asking whether one wants wdm, xdm, kdm or gdm to be the display
> > manager? That is implemented with init.d scripts checking
> > "default-display-manager" file though, this will have to work quite
> > differently. But for mere talkd, this whole interactive idea is a bit
> > overkill.</crazy>
>
> That would make it easier for inetd alternatives, such as xinetd, to correctly update
> their configuration files.
Isn't that why we have update-inetd(8) ?
Simon
Reply to: