[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: bad upgrade from talkd to ktalkd ... whose bug?



On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 05:35:22PM +0200, Hugo van der Merwe wrote:
> <crazy>I guess maybe one would want some neater interface to all this
> inetd.conf stuff? Some debconf thingy? A bit like the nice debconf
> question asking whether one wants wdm, xdm, kdm or gdm to be the display
> manager? That is implemented with init.d scripts checking
> "default-display-manager" file though, this will have to work quite
> differently. But for mere talkd, this whole interactive idea is a bit
> overkill.</crazy>

That would make it easier for inetd alternatives, such as xinetd, to correctly update
their configuration files.

-- 
Peter Mathiasson
E-Mail: peter@mathiasson.nu
Web   : http://www.mathiasson.nu

pub  1024D/7BF2F228 2001-10-13 Peter Mathiasson <peter@mathiasson.nu>
     Key fingerprint = A9A7 F8F6 9821 F415 B066  77F1 7FF5 C2E6 7BF2 F228
sub  2048g/3EFEABA4 2001-10-13 [expires: 2002-10-13]

Attachment: pgpJcWmk2sGcF.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: