On Sat, Oct 06, 2001 at 03:40:58PM +0200, Sebastian Rittau wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 06, 2001 at 02:53:17PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > Browse the archives and count the number of people who were in favour
> > of opt-in or no messages at all and compare that with the other people
> > people who were in favour of opt-in.
> Why should people (like me) who favor opt-out over opt-in have raised
> their voice?
Uh, so that your concerns get considered and the issue is resolved in
a fair way?
You're allowed to speak in support of things, as well as when your
bitterly opposed to them. It could be argued that it's even better to do
that, since arguing against things gets people fed up with doing stuff
for Debian.
If you want something to be offended by, perhaps you'd rather look at
it this way: if you didn't have anything intelligent to say then, why
should anyone think you've got anything intelligent to say now?
(And "me too" isn't helpful support, any more than "this sux!" is an
intelligent objection)
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``Freedom itself was attacked this morning by faceless cowards.
And freedom will be defended.'' Condolences to all involved.
Attachment:
pgpoeyyvnyeOA.pgp
Description: PGP signature